The Pontifical Biblical
Commission (advisory body to the Pope on the Scriptures) issued a document in
1964, entitled
Instruction on the Historical
Truth of the Gospels. It advises us to pay attention to the three
stages in the formation of the Gospels. Please
read CCC 126.
1) Jesus’ public ministry, 30-33 AD. Jesus explained the kingdom and chose his disciples to be his witnesses
2) After Pentecost, the apostles proclaimed the death and resurrection
of Jesus to others. The Jesus who
preached became the Christ who was preached. While preaching and explaining they took into account the needs and
circumstances of their listeners, passing on what was said and done by the Lord.
This is called the oral tradition.
3) The evangelists committed this primitive instruction to writing in
the Gospels which had been passed on orally at first and then in pre-Gospel
writings.
Luke admitted when he began
writing his Gospel that this was, in fact, how his Gospel grew up. Please read Luke 1:1-4 and compare it
with the above. Rewrite Luke 1:1-4
and insert 1, 2 and 3 in the appropriate places indicating the three stages of
formation.
Note therefore that we do not
have direct quotations from Jesus in the Gospels. What we have is two stages removed from Jesus. What we have in the Gospels is the apostles’ preaching
about Jesus which was put in writing by the evangelists. That is not 100% the same as Jesus’ own words. From the many things handed down to them
the evangelists selected some things, synthesized others, expanded others to
suit the situation of their churches at the time they were writing. For example as you will see in this
lesson, Mark writing after the fire of Rome draws attention to a suffering
Messiah asking us to carry our cross. Not
everything Jesus said and did is in the Gospels because the evangelists had to
make selections. An example of a
saying of Jesus which is not in any of the Gospels is “It is more blessed to
give than to receive” which is recorded in Acts.
Because Matthew, Mark and Luke
have many similarities they are called Synoptic Gospels, (‘syn’ in Greek =
together/with and ‘optic’ = seeing). Synoptic means “seeing together”.
Structure of the Synoptic
Gospels
It is sometimes said that the
Gospels are a passion story with an extended introduction.
Matthew
Mark
Luke
Jesus’ infancy
1-2
1-2
Jesus’ ministry in Galilee
3-
1-
3-9:50
Jesus’ journey to Jerusalem *
*
9:51-19:28
Jesus enters Jerusalem
21
11
19:28ff
Jesus’ Passion
26-27 14-15
22-23
Jesus’ Resurrection
28
16
24
*The
journey to Jerusalem is not clear-cut in Matt and Mark, but is in Luke.
Also note
that there is no infancy narrative (Christmas story) in Mark.
Geography of Palestine
To understand the Gospels you
need to know something of the geography of Palestine. A pilgrimage to the Holy Land is often
said to be the fifth Gospel. Note
the main points: Galilee in the north, Jerusalem in the south, the river Jordan
draining the Sea of Galilee in the north into the Dead Sea in the south. The only outlet from the dead sea is
evaporation which is reason for its saltiness. Please see your map of Palestine in Lesson 1 Part C and become familiar
with it. Return to it frequently
during the course.
|
PART B: THE
GOSPEL OF MARK |
SCRIPTURE
READING
In
this lesson you will begin to become familiar with the basic details of Mark’s
Gospel so I will give you many references. Please look up as many of them as possible to become familiar with Mark. In particular, read and study 8:22-10:52
which you may read now or when we come to that section of this lesson.
STUDY
Who is Mark?
Who is Mark? The Mark in question is thought to have
been John Mark mentioned as a companion of Paul (Acts 12:12,25; 13:5-13;
15:37-39; Col 4:10; Philemon 24; 2 Tim 4:11). 1 Peter 5:13 describes him as Peter’s co-worker “my son Mark”. He is thought to be the young man
mentioned in Gethsemane in Mark 14:51-52.
What sources did Mark use for
writing the Gospel?
There is
evidence from the Church of the early centuries that Mark’s main source was
Peter and that the Gospel was composed in Rome. Eusebius (263-339 AD) writing in Historia Ecclesiastica (The History
of the Church) quoted from Papias, the Bishop of Hieropolis in Asia
Minor (modern day Turkey) from c 100-130 AD.
“Mark, who had been Peter’s
interpreter, wrote down carefully, but not in order, all that he remembered of
the Lord’s sayings and doings. For
he had not heard the Lord or been one of His followers, but
later, as I said, one of Peter’s. Peter used to adapt his teaching to the
occasion, without making a systematic arrangement of the Lord’s sayings, so
that Mark was quite justified in writing down some things just as he remembered
them. For he had one purpose only -
to leave out nothing that he had heard, and to make no misstatement about it”.
This does
not mean that Peter was Mark’s only source, not everything in the Gospel comes
from Peter. But we can certainly
say that Peter was the
main source
Mark used.
When did Mark Write the Gospel
and for Whom?
The date of the composition of
the Gospel is fixed using events in Rome and Jerusalem. Traditionally the date for the writing
of the Gospel is said to have been after Peter’s death in Rome in 64 AD and
before the Jewish War in 67-70 AD. Peter
and Paul were martyred in Rome in 64 AD during the persecutions of the
Christians initiated by the Roman emperor Nero after the fire of Rome. Peter was crucified upside down to the
left of where St Peter’s Basilica now stands. On the left of the Basilica you see an arch with Swiss guards on duty. The coble-stoned area beyond the arch on
the left-hand side is believed to be the place of Peter’s crucifixion. Paul was beheaded outside the city,
although it is now well within the city. The
history of Jerusalem also helps us to date Mark. Matt, Mark and Luke each have an eschatological chapter, that is, a
chapter dealing with eschatology, which includes, among other things, the
destruction of Jerusalem. Eschatology
concerns the last things, the end of time. In Mark it is chapter 13, in Matt chapter 24 and in Luke it is chapter
21. There is nothing in Mark 13 to suggest that the destruction
of the temple in Jerusalem, which took place in AD 70, has already occurred. This is predicted by Jesus in Mark 13:2. In Mark it prediction, whereas Matt and
Luke, writing after the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 could be more
detailed. Therefore scholars
conclude that the Gospel was written before this date.
Since Mark composed his Gospel in
Rome and it would be read by non-Jewish converts to Christianity as well as
former Jews, you would expect him to explain matters that Gentile (non-Jewish,
we Christians are Gentiles) readers of his Gospel would not be familiar with. See how Mark translates Aramaic words
for the benefit of his readers in 5:41; 7:34; 15:34
Structure of the Gospel
To understand a Gospel we need to
understand something about its structure. Putting
it simply, we can divide Mark into two halves. In the first half of the Gospel Jesus is mainly concerned with teaching
the crowds. He uses parables and
miracles and rejects any notion that he is the Messiah. For example, we see Jesus commanding
demons not to reveal who he is (1:34; 3:12), and also people he healed (1:43;
7:36) and raised from the dead (5:43). This
is sometimes referred to as the Messianic Secret. In the first half of the Gospel the action is largely in
Galilee.
In 8:27-30 Peter confesses Jesus
to be the Messiah which proves to be a watershed in the Gospel. From then on
Jesus tries to teach his disciples what the true nature of the Messiah is, a
suffering Messiah as we will see in 8:22-10:52. They had thought the Messiah would be powerful and would drive out the
Romans from Palestine (Palestine was under Roman occupation since 63 BC). From 8:30 onwards the action moves
outside of Galilee.
The longer ending (16:9-20) was
not written by Mark but added later. This
ending is not in several manuscripts. It
was added because the original ending (women fleeing in fear in 16:8) was felt
to be inadequate. Curiously this
longer ending not written by Mark is the Gospel passage that we read on Mark’s
feast day on 25 April!
WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A DISCIPLE OF JESUS ACCORDING TO MARK
Mark 1-8:21
Now we begin to read the Gospel. Jesus called the first four disciples
and immediately they left their nets and followed him (1:16-20). Would they leave everything and follow a
stranger immediately? Unlikely, if
they had sense. Remember the
evangelists are presenting facts with their audience in mind. Mark is here trying to impress on the
readers the drastic nature of following Jesus. Jesus defended the disciples against the scribes and Pharisees in
2:18,23-24. In 3:13-19 Jesus chose
the Twelve and sent them on a mission recorded in 6:6b-13. It meant detachment from family and
occupation, and a commitment to preach Jesus’ teachings.
When Jesus taught in parables we
expect the disciples to understand but they don’t and Jesus becomes impatient
(4:13,40). Notice in 6:34-36 that
the crowd was absorbed in Jesus’ teaching but not the disciples. Jesus called his disciples to serve the
crowd, “Give them something to eat themselves” (6:37). This meaning of discipleship as service
escaped the disciples. When Jesus
came to them walking on the sea they were astonished because they did not
understand about the loaves, their minds were closed (6:51-52). Although in 4:11-12 Jesus had said to
the disciples that the secret of the kingdom of God was given to them, it seems
that the more and more they saw they did not perceive, the more and more they
heard they did not understand since in 6:51-2 and again in 7:18-19 Jesus was
disappointed that the disciples did not understand. The question of the disciples in 8:4
(the crowd was with Jesus for three days and had no food) shows that they
learned nothing from the first feeding in 6:30-44. In the scene in the boat following this,
the disciples misunderstand Jesus and he asked seven questions reacting to their
spiritual blindness (8:17-21). The
answer to the questions is ‘No’. The
disciples don’t understand the meaning of the multiplication miracles nor who
Jesus is.
Mark 8:22-10:52
If you have not already read this
section please do so now before continuing. This section of the Gospel is where we see Jesus teaching that being a
disciple means service and suffering.
Read the first story and last
story of this section, 8:22-10:52. What
do you notice? What is the same and
what is different in each story?
At Caesarea Philippi Peter
proclaimed Jesus as the Messiah. In
case the disciples would have the wrong idea about what type of Messiah Jesus
was, and falsely think he would expel the Romans from Palestine, he then began
to teach them that he must suffer and die (8:31-33). This is the first time that Jesus
predicts his passion. We call these
statements in the Gospels the ‘Passion Predictions.’ This is not what Peter
and the disciples want, and Peter tries to dissuade Jesus, but receives harsh
words from Jesus (8:33). Then Jesus
teaches that anyone who follows him must take up the cross (8:34). A second time Jesus taught his disciples
about his future passion but they did not understand what he said and were
afraid to ask him (9:30-32). Instead
of understanding they had an argument about which of them was the greatest
(9:33-34). Jesus counteracted by
saying that if anyone wants to be first he must make himself last of all and
servant of all (9:35). Emphasizing
his point Jesus put a child in the midst of them and said that anyone who
welcomes a child welcomes him (9:37). However
it seems that the disciples did not learn anything because shortly afterwards
(10:13) they scolded the people who brought children to Jesus for him to touch
them. Jesus said that the
rewards of discipleship will be accompanied with persecutions (10:30). A third time Jesus predicted his
passion, most explicitly of all (10:32-34). What was the disciples’ response to this? James and John asked for seats on his
right hand and his left hand. Then
the other ten became indignant with James and John (10:41). So once more Jesus teaches them about
discipleship; anyone who wants to be great among you must be your servant
(10:43-44). We are disappointed
with the disciples.In the Christian community those in positions of authority
are called to be servants.
As you saw in your exercise
above, this section is bracketed or sandwiched by two stories of Jesus restoring
sight; 8:22-26 and 10:46-52. Those
stories are meant to be symbolic of what Jesus is doing in this section of his
ministry and in this section of the Gospel of Mark, i.e. opening eyes to
appreciate who he is, the suffering Messiah. In the second healing, the sight is restored totally at once, but in the
first (8:22-26) the man’s sight is restored in stages, the only miracle where
Jesus doesn’t succeed the first time! That
is the way it is for the disciples, they do not appreciate Jesus fully and will
need further teaching.
Matthew and Luke also contain
passion predictions similar to Mark. Can
you find them? Hint. Look for the
first ones in Matt 16 and Luke 9.
Mark 11-16
Now that we have looked at that
section of the Gospel, with intensive teaching on what it means to be a disciple
of Jesus (8:22-10:52), let’s look for clues elsewhere in the Gospel. When Peter professes that he will never
fall away our sympathies lie with him (14:27-30). We are disappointed that the disciples cannot even stay awake in the
garden and we are dismayed that the women on hearing the message of the angel
fled in fear (16:8).
Overview
Those who were called by Jesus to
discipleship resisted the idea of Jesus as a suffering Messiah. They also resisted suffering as a
necessary part of discipleship and did not take to the idea of ministering to
others, or serving. The
disappointment we feel with the disciples in Mark is actually the disappointment
we feel with ourselves. We want
them to be perfect disciples, free from fear and failure, because we want to be
fearless and faithful. Do we want
the disciples to be presented as perfect because we suffer from perfectionism? It is a challenge to us to see ourselves
as fallible followers. Marks’s
Gospel questions the images we project onto others in order to protect ourselves
from the truth lying beneath. We
are also the disciples in question, as well as the frightened women and the
Twelve who desert Jesus. Mark’s
story continues in our own lives. The
Gospel speaks to those who have experienced failure and need to begin anew. Mark presents Jesus more humanly than
the other Gospels but also presents people more humanly. Using Peter as his source he obviously gained insights into
the humanity of the disciples. Peter’s
denial is given much more attention in Mark than in Luke. It receives about equal attention in
Matthew. Again the reason is
probably the same, Mark obtained many details from Peter.
Mark has an image for
discipleship. He calls it being “on
the way” e.g. in 8:27. Discipleship
is not just making one momentous decision but is being “on the way”. The call of the first four disciples was not a once for all
conversion, but was the first step in a long and often faltering journey. Understanding discipleship as being “on
the way” gives us the possibility to restart.
We are disappointed by those
called by Jesus to be his disciples while there are others not called who are
portrayed as having the qualities necessary for discipleship. The stories of
Peter’s mother-in-law and Simon of Cyrene portray ideals of service and
suffering, ministry and cross. The
widow who sacrificed her only two coins (12:41-44) is a marvellous expression of
complete trust in God. She could
have kept one and given one in the temple. Like her we need to trust in God. The
Roman soldier at the cross is the first human being to recognize Jesus as the
Son of God (15:39).
THE SUFFERING MESSIAH AND HIS
FOLLOWERS
Suffering was not just accidental
in Jesus’ life; it was a divine necessity, a part of his calling. The Greek word dei is used by Mark in 8:31
when Jesus predicts his passion. That
Greek word signifies that it was part of God’s plan. The three passion predictions tell this with greater
intensity and more detail each time. Even
though Mark does not say as explicitly as Paul that this suffering is for the
forgiveness of our sins, this is understood. The Son of Man came to give his life as a ransom for many (10:45) and
Jesus describes his death as the blood of the covenant poured out for many
(14:24).
Mark is concerned to show how
Jesus showed his followers that the path of discipleship is also the path of
suffering. In the explanation of
the Parable of the Sower (4:13-20), Jesus warned of a trial or persecution that
would test the Christian (4:17). The
Parable of the Sower itself occurs in 4:1-9. The death of John the Baptist (6:14-29), although not a follower of Jesus
but a witness, is another example of suffering for the Christian. After Peter’s confession of faith in Jesus (8:27-30) and
Jesus’ explanation of his future suffering (8:31-33), Jesus explained that if
anyone wanted to be a follower of his he must renounce himself and take up his
cross (8:34). Those who will leave
to follow Jesus will receive a hundredfold but with persecutions (10:30). James and John will drink the cup that
Jesus will drink (10:39) if they are to be his followers. It is in 13:9-13 that there is the clearest teaching on the
inevitability of Christian persecution, suffering and even death. The reason given is that it is for Jesus’
name. The two stories of storms at
sea (4:35-41; 6:45-52) are best understood as the way in which Jesus rescues the
Christian community of Mark’s time in its persecution (remember the
persecutions in Rome after the fire in 64 AD). To follow Jesus means to tread the way that he trod, because that is the
whole meaning of following. Mark’s
purpose was to build up his readers so that they could sustain a period of
persecution. Persecution was
endemic in the early church. Mark
wrote for Christians, like us, who did not like suffering.
TITLES APPLIED TO JESUS IN MARK
Why do I spend some times here on
the titles applied to Jesus in Mark? The
reason is because they tell us something about Jesus. Mark was answering the question, “Who
is Jesus?” through the titles he applied to Jesus. You will see the same titles used also
in the other Gospels but time does not allow me to comment on these titles again
when we will read Luke and Matthew. However,
understanding the titles applied to Jesus in Mark, will help you understand the
use of the titles in Luke and Matthew also.
Christ / Messiah
The Gospel
opens in 1:1 by stating that it is the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Christ/Messiah means anointed. ‘Christ’ is the Greek translation of
the Hebrew word ‘Messiah’. It
means that Jesus is God’s Anointed One. Peter in Acts 10:38 says Jesus was anointed by the Holy
Spirit. This took place at his
baptism in the Jordan when the dove descended on him. During the first half the Gospel Jesus
conceals his messianic identity as God’s anointed. I have already referred to this above as
the messianic secret. In 8:28 Peter affirms that Jesus is the Messiah but then
Jesus has to teach them that he will be a suffering Messiah. During his trial before the Sanhedrin,
the high priest asked Jesus, “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?” Jesus answered, “I am”. It is important to note that it is
during his passion that Jesus admits that he is the Christ/Messiah. It shows that his identity as Messiah
can only be understood in the light of his passion and death.
Son of God
Jesus is also introduced in 1:1
as the Son of God. This is
confirmed in 1:11 by the voice from heaven during Jesus’ baptism. The demons address Jesus as Son of God,
e.g. in 3:11 and 5:7. We see the
messianic secret coming into play again in 1:34 and 3:12 when Jesus would not
allow the demons to make his identity known. When the demons address Jesus as Son of God during exorcism it shows
Jesus’ authority as Son of God. In
9:7 once again a voice from heaven affirms during the Transfiguration that Jesus
is the Son of God. In 14:61 during
the Sanhedrin trial, Jesus was asked if he was the Christ, the Son
of the Blessed One, and he answered affirmatively. While on the cross Jesus was mocked as
Messiah/Christ and king of Israel by the Jewish religious authorities in 15:32
but a Roman centurion correctly declared, “In truth this man was the Son of
God” (15:39). The readers of Mark
knew from the statement in 1:1 that Jesus was the Son of God but by the end of
the Gospel many of those who knew Jesus, excluding the Jewish authorities, knew
that he was the Son of God. This
may have some connection with a plot structure used in some ancient drama
whereby the audience knew the truth sfrom the beginning but the characters in
the drama gradually came to learn the truth as the drama evolved. Also note that both titles, Christ and
Son of God, come together while Jesus is on the cross, 15:32 and 15:39. Mark is saying that we cannot understand
Jesus as Messiah/Christ or Son of God apart from his suffering on the cross. It is intrinsic to Jesus as Christ and
Son of God.
King
The title ‘king’ appears 12
times in Mark, revolving around 2 distinct scenes, King Herod in 6:14-29 and
Jesus in 15:1-20 during his trial. Read
both of these passages now.
List
the differences between King Herod and Jesus. You can use this as a meditation on the feast of Christ the King.
A king has power. Herod has power, prestige and luxury. But he is also plagued by weakness, superstitious fears,
vanity and treachery. Ultimately
Herod is not powerful, but is treacherous, weak, boastful and easily seduced. Power can dull our judgment. Jesus also has power, but a different
type of power. Jesus has power over
nature; multiplication of loaves and fish, calming the storm, expelling demons,
power over sickness. In contrast to
Herod, Jesus did not exercise power over people. His enemies plotted freely against him. We need to compare any power we have with the Word of God and allow
ourselves to be converted if necessary. The
kingdom of God arrives in Jesus, in his words and deeds. It challenges and threatens all earthly
kingdoms.
Kings receive people of
distinction at court. On his birthday Herod had a banquet with courtiers,
officers and leading men of Galilee (6:21). Jesus receives the powerless, sick, suffering, and sorrowing. They offer no gift to Jesus and Jesus
gives them gifts by making them whole again. Jesus ate with those shunned by society, with tax collectors and sinners. Jesus associated with the unclean, and
with children who were looked down on by society at that time.
Wealth and riches measure earthly
kingdoms, but these assets could become a liability in entering the kingdom of
God. Earthly kingdoms are judged by
their size. Jesus’ kingdom has a
small beginning like a mustard seed but will grow large (4:30-32). Earthly kingdoms like to demonstrate
strength in numbers and power but God’s kingdom is a hidden kingdom, a reality
which is already with us and yet is still coming, longing for its completion,
visible only to those to whom its mystery has been entrusted.
Jesus entered Jerusalem riding on
a donkey in Mark 11. (Kings entered
cities at least on horseback and preferably on chariot. On the importance of horses see 1 Kings
5:6). Jesus is a humble king. He enters not to rule, but to suffer and die. Jesus has the appearances of kingship in Mark 15:17-19; a
purple cloak (purple is a royal color), a crown, a sceptre (Jesus was struck
with a reed as a mock sceptre in 15:19), people kneeling before him in homage. But Jesus was never lord over all;
instead he was servant to all.
Son of Man
This is the only title that Jesus uses to
describe himself in Mark. To understand what Jesus meant by using this title of himself
it is essential to know what those who heard Jesus would automatically assume
when they heard Jesus describe himself as the Son of Man. While some would say it meant different things it seems to me
that above all it means the following. Please
read now Daniel 7:9-10, 13-14. Note
the description of the Son of Man in Dan 7:13-14. It is a description of a glorious Messiah. So this title, like Christ and Messiah, is also a title to refer to the
expected Messiah. So when Jesus
uses this title he is admitting that he is the expected Messiah. But notice when Jesus uses this title. He uses this title in the three passion
predictions. Read them once again
in the teaching section, 8:22-10:52. Once again we see Jesus teaching that the expected Messiah
would be a suffering Messiah, not the type of Messiah they had expected.
Son of David
‘Son of David’ was the chief
messianic title in use to describe the expected Messiah at the time of Jesus. This is because they knew the Messiah
would be a descendant of King David. The
prophet Nathan had made this promise to David in 2 Sam 7:4-17. Read that passage now. When Jesus entered Jerusalem there was a
suggestion that he was that Son of David in 11:10. ‘Son of David’ was used at the time of Jesus to describe
an earthly messiah, a king or great ruler who would free Palestine from Roman
occupation. Once again, therefore,
Jesus had to teach the true meaning of the Son of David which he did in a
difficult passage in 12:35-37. In
this enigmatic passage Jesus is saying that the Son of David is Lord of David
due to his resurrection and will sit at the right hand of the Father in heaven. (The Lord, i.e. the Father, said to my
Lord, i.e. the Son of David, Jesus, to take his seat at his right hand and the
enemies of the Son of David will be as a stool for under his feet through his
resurrection). Do you think the
scribes and the people could have understood what Jesus meant when he spoke
this? No way. This would have become clear only after
Jesus’ resurrection and ascension. That
is why it is explained only in Acts 2:34. It
could not have been explained before Jesus took his seat at the right hand of
his Father in heaven!
FURTHER
READING
Margaret
Nutting Ralph
Discovering the Gospels: Four
Accounts of the Good News pages 7-57
RA Cole Mark (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries)
The article
in the
NJBC on Mark.
PRAYER
Before you
pray read Mark 5:21-43. Use these
miracles to pray for healing of wounds and hurts you experienced going through
life. I would like to recall for
you the motto chosen by the Catholic Church for the Jubilee 2000, “Jesus
Christ, the same, yesterday, today and forever.” (Hebrews 13:8) No matter when you were hurt,
remembering that Jesus is the same always, that our yesterday is today for him,
our yesterday is now for him, ask him to walk back in time with you to the day
when you suffered that particular hurt or received the news of your illness. Use this every day until you experience
healing through it. Jesus wants to
heal you now as he healed the sick woman and raised the dead girl. Close your eyes and relax. Keep both feet on the ground. Become
aware of the presence of God with you. If it helps, light a candle or look at a sacred picture.
Imagine Jesus by your side or in
front of you…Make your way through the crowd to Jesus like the bleeding woman…When
you pray like this at home you can cry to Jesus if you need to and let him wipe
your tears. I have read that tears
contain a depressant in our body concentrated 40 times more than normal so
crying is good way to release depressants….In your imagination touch Jesus’
cloak wishing for his healing…Feel the love of Jesus healing you….Hear Jesus
say to you, “Your faith has restored you to health…”….Or in your
imagination see Jesus take you by the hand as he took Jairus’ daughter by hand
and let Jesus help you up, “I tell you to get up”….Jesus said about the
girl, “She is not dead, only asleep.” (5:39) Hear Jesus say to you, “Your
wound is not permanent, it is only temporary, I am healing you”…Let Jesus
comfort you after the hurt you received….Let the love of Jesus replace all the
damage and hurt and woundedness….Just as the Good Samaritan poured oil and
wine on the wounds of the injured man on the road to Jericho, let Jesus pour his
love on your wounds and replace your wounds with his love…Touch Jesus’
garments and let your bleeding, your suffering, dry up…Hear Jesus say to you,
“You are not dead, only asleep. Get
up”….Tell Jesus about your pain and hurt….In your imagination see Jesus
putting his hand on your head and feel the healing and love of Jesus flow
through you from your head down to your feet…Feel the love of Jesus replacing
your wounds with his love and healing you and making you whole again. Finally thank Jesus for helping and
healing you.